Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
Plaintiffs lawyers' recurring nightmare is the prospect that expert scientific testimony may become mandatory for even the simplest numeric projections, as an outgrowth of the 1993 U.S. Supreme Court Daubert ruling, which was intended to limit testimony based on "junk science." Countering those fears is the Connecticut testimony of secretary Maria Scotti, which could turn out to be worth $1.3 million -- or just $1 -- and could create an important guidepost for scientific testimony.
October 14, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS