Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The first criminal trial involving former Enron Corp. executives opened Tuesday with prosecutors charging that the defendants conspired with Wall Street bankers to carry out a sham transaction. Prosecutors said in opening statements that Enron sold three electricity-producing barges moored off the coast of Nigeria at the end of 1999 in a sham deal designed to help the energy company appear to have met earnings targets. They said buyer Merrill Lynch & Co. agreed to the deal to acquire more lucrative investment banking business from Enron — at the time a high-dollar client courted by Wall Street. “This was really no more than a loan — a loan to help Enron out of a jam at the end of 1999,” Assistant U.S. Attorney John Hemann told the jury. The barge deal is not among the financial indiscretions that pushed Enron into bankruptcy in 2001. However, prosecutors say it shows Enron was willing to employ suspect financial practices to meet lofty earnings targets. Four former Merrill executives and two former midlevel Enron executives were charged last year with conspiracy and fraud. Defense attorneys disputed the government’s claims. Lawrence Zweifach, who represents James A. Brown, the former chief of Merrill Lynch’s asset lease and finance group, presented a handwritten note in which he said Brown listed several concerns about the December 1999 barge deal. “Every item he wrote down reflects he was worried Merrill Lynch was at risk in this investment,” Zweifach said. Attorneys for former Enron executive Dan Boyle and former Enron accountant Sheila Kahanek each called their clients “bit players” in comparison to higher-ups at Enron who signed deal approval documents or received bonuses for their work on the barge deal. Some of those executives are among prosecution witnesses who have not been charged with any crimes. The first witness was a former Enron employee who told jurors that Kahanek yelled at her for drafting a document that outlined the barge agreement. “She told me I had jeopardized the deal by putting certain information in the document and that if it fell into the hands of (auditor) Arthur Andersen the deal was over,” Amanda Colpean said. All six of the executives face one count of conspiracy and two counts of wire fraud. Three of them also face charges of lying to either a grand jury, the FBI or a congressional investigator about whether they knew of the barge deal. Copyright 2004 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.