Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
Legal observers weren't surprised when the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals refused last week to re-open litigation in the landmark Roe v. Wade abortion case. But they took notice when one of the judges wrote a concurrence to her own opinion, in which she railed against the procedural history of the U.S. Supreme Court's 1973 decision and referred to the high court opinion as an "exercise of raw judicial power."
September 20, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS