Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
New York City and advocates for battered women and their children agreed in court Tuesday that child welfare officials cannot remove children simply because they witnessed the abuse of their mother. In a widely watched case argued at the state Court of Appeals, attorneys seemed to agree more than disagree. Where they differed was on the relatively nuanced point of whether authorities can, without judicial oversight, remove a child because of domestic violence.
September 09, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS