Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Arizona Supreme Court recently upheld a ruling broadening a doctor's obligation to inform a patient about his or her medical tests -- even if the two never actually meet. Arizona now joins a small group of states -- including Washington, Mississippi, Maryland and Ohio -- that hold doctors potentially liable despite the absence of a traditional doctor-patient relationship. That absence "does not necessarily preclude the imposition of a duty of care," the court ruled.
August 06, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS