Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
Finding that a federal prosecutor went too far in his closing argument when he referred to an arson defendant as a "terrorist" in a speech delivered just one day before the first anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ordered a new trial. The court ruled that the closing speech capped a trial studded with unfairly prejudicial evidence regarding crimes that were never charged in the indictment.
July 16, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS