Hatfill Sues 'New York Times' Over Anthrax Columns

A bioterrorism expert who was named by government authorities as a "person of interest" in the 2001 anthrax attacks has sued The New York Times , saying the newspaper ruined his reputation by pointing to him as the culprit. Steven J. Hatfill filed the suit Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Alexandria, Va., charging that a series of columns by Nicholas Kristof was irresponsible by failing to seek, or rejecting, statements of denials from Hatfill.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A bioterrorism expert who was named by government authorities as a “person of interest” in the 2001 anthrax attacks has sued The New York Times, saying the newspaper ruined his reputation by pointing to him as the culprit. Steven J. Hatfill filed the lawsuit Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Alexandria, Va. He charged that a series of columns by Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Nicholas Kristof was irresponsible by failing to seek, or rejecting, statements of denials from Hatfill. In several columns in 2002, Kristof faulted the FBI for not actively investigating a scientist he identified as “Mr. Z.” Descriptions of the “Mr. Z” were detailed enough that readers could recognize him as Hatfill and subsequent columns later identified him, the complaint states. “It was inconsequential to defendant Kristof whether it turned out that his designated culprit was guilty or innocent, how reckless his allegations and insinuations were, or how injurious they were to his victim,” the lawsuit alleges. “What was at issue … was to help ‘light a fire’ under the federal investigators.” The lawsuit said the newspaper declined to print a letter to the editor and an op-ed article from Hatfill’s lawyer, Victor Glasberg, that responded to the charges, according to the complaint. A Times spokesman, Toby Usnik, said the lawsuit lacked merit. He noted that Hatfill had already been identified by government authorities as a “person of interest” by the time Kristof’s columns ran. “While encouraging the FBI to investigate the matter, Mr. Kristof was careful to note that Dr. Hatfill was presumed to be innocent,” Usnik said. “We believe in a case like this, the law protects fair commentary on an important public issue.” Hatfill also has a lawsuit pending against Attorney General John Ashcroft and other government authorities who named him as a “person of interest.” U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton in Washington is expected to rule soon on a government request to have that lawsuit dismissed. Copyright 2004 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Trending Stories

 

Featured Product

Global Briefing

A weekly, curated selection of our international content from around the globe, across the business of law, in-house, regulatory, technology and more, with expert insights from our senior editors.

Learn More

More from ALM

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Privacy Policy

About Us / Contact Us / Site Map / Advertise With Us/ Customer Service / Terms of Service/ FAQ / Privacy Policy

Publications

Law Topics

Rankings

More

Law.com

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.