X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Perhaps Ken Lay shouldn’t be prosecuted after all. The papers were filed last week with reports that Enron Corp.’s former chairman is about to be indicted by a federal grand jury. Lay is the final major figure involved with the energy trader’s collapse to not yet face charges. The Houston Chronicle said Tuesday that Lay’s lawyers have requested another meeting with prosecutors in Washington by early this week after a grand jury spent five days this month hearing testimony about the chairman’s alleged misdeeds. Lay’s lawyer told the Chronicle that his client is prepared to answer the government’s questions. “I don’t believe Ken Lay will be indicted at all,” the lawyer told the Houston paper. “Ken Lay didn’t do a crime.” Lay may well have committed a crime by either failing to detect the chicanery of ousted chief financial officer Andrew Fastow, who has pleaded guilty to fraud, or by tacitly approving of Fastow’s cooking the books so Enron would look healthier than it was. Yet without the collapse of Enron, other corporate scandals could have remained hidden for years. Instead of surfacing in 2001, the malfeasance could have come to light in 2003 or 2004 and hurt the U.S. economic recovery. None of the legal reforms that force companies to disclose more information, hire genuinely independent auditors and have their chairmen certify corporate financial statements would have occurred. No independent agency would have been created to police the accounting industry. Republicans might be especially grateful for Lay’s contributions to corporate reform. Imagine if all the business scandals were coming out now, near the end of President Bush’s term and only months before he faces re-election. Even supporters of a Financial Accounting Standards Board plan to require companies to expense stock option owe a debt of gratitude to Enron. Repercussions from the string of corporate catastrophes in recent years spurred a serious review of the accuracy of financial statements. That, in turn, revived the options expensing movement. But while those who lost their savings because of Enron won’t rest easy until Lay is behind bars, the rest of us may want to ponder if U.S. business is not stronger and the markets more durable because of the scandal. Lay has yet to face charges. But three former National Westminster Bank plc employees are accused of stealing $7.3 million in an Enron-related scheme. The Houston Chronicle said Tuesday that David Bermingham, Gary Mulgrew and Giles Darby, who face seven counts of wire fraud, are fighting extradition. They appeared before Bow Street Magistrates Court in London to ask why they were not being charged there. “Why is this case not being brought to trial in London?” the Chronicle quoted attorney Alun Jones, who represents the three men, as saying. “NatWest Bank is based in London. All three are U.K. nationals who live here. They are being investigated by the Financial Services Authority here, and the U.S. government is relying on interviews that have been given by the three to the FSA.” No word on when the London court will rule. Meanwhile, the first criminal trial stemming from the Enron affair is likely to be delayed even longer. The Houston Chronicle said a grand jury on Wednesday added additional charges against four former Merrill Lynch & Co. employees and two former Enron employees who are accused of setting up a fraudulent transaction involving the sale of barges. They initially were set to face trial on June 7, though that was later switched to Aug. 16 when it became apparent the trial would take longer than scheduled. Enron officials are not the only ones facing trial. Bloomberg News said Wednesday that former Global Crossing Ltd. chairman Gary Winnick must face charges leveled by a group of banks that he misled them about the company’s finances. The banks, led by J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., want $1.7 billion in restitution. Copyright �2004 TDD, LLC. All rights reserved.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.