In a case brought by the owners of a family-run orchard who objected to paying mandatory fees for generic advertising for plums, the California Supreme Court held last week that the marketing program does not violate the federal speech rights of Gerawan Farming Inc. But the justices said lower courts must do fact-finding to determine whether the program serves the substantial public purpose of protecting the state's plum industry.
June 07, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Where the region's top lawyers, law firms and in-house teams will gather to celebrate their most stellar achievements of the year.
We are seeking a lawyer with a minimum of five years of experience in transactional work to join our well-established, nationally renowned C...
We are seeking a lawyer with extensive transactional intellectual property experience to join our corporate practice. Candidates should hav...
0-5 year associate attorney needed for a civil litigation firm in the Buckheadarea. Great opportunity for advancement. Salary will be commen...
Snyder Sarno D'Aniello Maceri & daCosta would like to announce that...
COLE SCHOTZ P.C. WELCOME HONORABLE GARRY S. ROTHSTADT, J.A.D. (RET.)
GREENBAUM ROWE SMITH & DAVIS LLP would like to announce that...
