Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
Oral argument over the constitutionality of New York's 52-year ban on cameras in the courtroom evoked surprisingly few questions Wednesday from a panel of the Appellate Division, 1st Department. Jonathan Sherman, who pressed Court TV's appeal of a ruling upholding the law, told the five-judge panel that the ban without doubt implicated free speech rights and the rationale for barring cameras has long since passed.
June 04, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS