Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
Jurors should decide whether an allegedly injured patient acted reasonably in not filing a professional negligence claim within a two-year statute of limitations, plaintiffs lawyers argued to Pennsylvania's Supreme Court Thursday. Plaintiffs in two cases said the clock for filing a cause of action should begin to run on the day they realized that adverse symptoms were caused by negligence and were not normal after-effects of surgery.
April 19, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS