AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT TESTED
The issue in this apparent case of first impression is whether the Superior Court erred in creating an exception to the at-will employment doctrine.
In a closely watched case challenging the granting of benefits to city employees' registered same-sex "life partners," Philadelphia taxpayers are contending that the ordinance at issue constitutes an impermissible attempt to legislate in the area of marriage. Religious groups and the state chapter of the ACLU have filed amicus briefs in the case, which goes before the state Supreme Court today.
April 13, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT TESTED
The issue in this apparent case of first impression is whether the Superior Court erred in creating an exception to the at-will employment doctrine.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS