Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
A defense attorney forced to testify against a client should have withdrawn from the case, the New York Court of Appeals has found. The court upheld an ineffective-assistance claim and upset a drug conviction because defense counsel gave testimony -- briefly and outside the jury's presence -- that was contrary to his client's interests. The attorney-client relationship is irreparably damaged whenever a lawyer testifies against a client, the court seemed to conclude.
April 08, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS