Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A retired minister, a college student and a member of the military are among those involved in the American Civil Liberties Union’s challenge to the list of travelers that the government has barred from flying because they’re considered a threat. Airlines are instructed to stop anyone on the “no fly” list that is compiled by the Transportation Security Administration. The ACLU contends, though, that some people are wrongfully put on the list. “Many innocent travelers who pose no safety risk whatsoever are stopped and searched repeatedly,” the ACLU said in a statement issued Monday. ACLU officials declined to comment in advance of their planned announcement Tuesday that they would file a class action lawsuit challenging the list. The civil rights group is representing seven plaintiffs, including the military person, the minister and the student. The no-fly list is one of two lists kept by the TSA. The other is the “selectee.” Those on the no-fly list are not allowed to board a commercial aircraft. Those on the selectee list must go through more extensive screening before boarding. Federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies request that the TSA put names on the list. Little else is known about the lists, including how many people are on them and how they qualify to get on or off. The TSA acknowledged the name-matching technology used by some airlines confuses people on the no-fly list with passengers who have similar names. In such a case, a passenger would be referred to a law enforcement official, who would be able to clear up mistakes by checking the person’s identification and perhaps putting in a call to the FBI, agency spokesman Mark Hatfield said. Problems with the no-fly list have provided fodder for critics of the TSA plan to conduct computerized background checks of all airline passengers and to rank them according to their risk of being a terrorist. They say that if a no-fly list with relatively few names causes confusion and produces misidentifications, the government cannot be trusted with a far broader program. Some people on the no-fly list have found it impossible to get off, said David Sobel, general counsel for the Electronic Privacy Information Center. “There doesn’t seem to be any reliable way to resolve the problem that these people continuously confront,” Sobel said. Hatfield acknowledge such problems exist but said the agency has worked to help people wrongly identified. Separately, the TSA said Monday that it is seeking proposals from companies to run a pilot “registered traveler” program in which low-risk frequent fliers could avoid extra security inspections at airports by submitting to background checks. Copyright 2004 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.