Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A finding of diminished capacity has led a Southern District of New York judge to depart downward from the federal sentencing guidelines for a man whose trading in child pornography was found to be peripheral to his consuming obsession with sexual images on the Internet. Judge Robert W. Sweet, over the objection of the government, said he will sentence Stephen Tanasi to nine months in prison after psychological evaluations showed Tanasi was not a sexual predator and apparently had no interest in adult-child sex. Tanasi pleaded guilty on May 14, 2002, to receiving and distributing computer files that contained child pornography under 18 U.S.C. 2252(a)(2)(B). Sweet said that, pursuant to a plea agreement with the government, Tanasi’s sentence under the guidelines was to be somewhere between 33 months and 41 months. But in February 2003, Sweet told the parties he would downwardly depart and sentence Tanasi to nine months in prison followed by a three-year term of supervisory release, a departure under � 5K2.13 of the guidelines where significantly reduced mental capacity “contributed substantially to the commission of the offense.” In an opinion released Monday, Sweet said he was denying the government’s opposition to the departure, which was based on both the court-ordered evaluation of Tanasi by an independent expert and the evaluation of a defense psychologist. Both experts, Sweet said, concluded that Tanasi was not a sexual predator. Both portrayed him as a man so obsessed with pornography that he spent an inordinate amount of time collecting thousands of images from the Internet. The defense expert said Tanasi was “a very na�ve, socially awkward, immature individual with a non-paraphilic sexual disorder: a compulsive addiction to pornography and involvement in non-paraphilic but addictive behavior with his partner.” Paraphilic disorders, Sweet explained, are a “complex of sexual disorders, one of the most common of which is pedophilia.” Even a government expert, Sweet said, concluded that, assuming Tanasi “had some obsession or compulsion involving adult pornography, his ‘need’ for pornography does not seem to have extended to images of children.” Sweet noted that Tanasi “suffered from diminished capacity, or an impaired ability to recognize the wrongfulness of his behavior and to control it.” The government expert disagreed, and while he acknowledged that Tanasi had “some obsession or compulsion involving adult pornography,” he noted that Tanasi had “nearly complete control” over his behavior. Tanasi, in his evaluations, said he found child pornography “disgusting.” He also asserted that he initially deleted images of child pornography that were sent to him, and only later saved some images of children to trade with people who asked for it in trade for adult images. The government, the judge noted, agreed that Tanasi’s collection of child pornography was “only a currency that he knowingly used to obtain the type of pornography in which he was interested.” “However,” Sweet said, Tanasi’s “involvement with child pornography was not a product of controlled, rational calculation, but rather stemmed from a pornographic obsession in constant need of fueling.” “This obsession escalated to the point where he spent hours collecting and transmitting thousands of pornographic images indiscriminately, becoming hyper-aroused by almost anything and desensitized to child pornography,” he said. Since Tanasi’s diminished capacity was not related to drugs, the offense did not involve violence or the threat of violence, and he has no criminal history, Sweet said that “there is no bar to downward departure” when he sentences Tanasi on March 19. Assistant U.S. Attorney Christina Paqlia Bischoff represented the government. M. Hatcher Norris of Butler Norris & Gold in Hartford, Conn., represented Tanasi.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.