Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
A California appeals court ruled Thursday that cities aren't violating the First Amendment by forcing Internet cafe owners to have security guards and surveillance cameras. But the decision, upholding an ordinance aimed at curbing gang-related violence, drew unusually sharp dissent from one justice, who called the ruling an "emasculation" of privacy rights and accused the majority of blessing Orwellian "Big Brother" governmental oversight.
February 02, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS