X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The current methodology for collecting electronic evidence in response to Hart-Scott-Rodino second requests and large electronic discovery cases is about to change dramatically. Data collection involves copying responsive data from the hard drive of a target computer to a portable drive or other storage device for transport to an EDD vendor for processing. Properly preserving electronic evidence is the goal of data collection. Unfortunately, a look behind the current process reveals flaws. In a large corporate setting, the harvesting of responsive data is done using portable hard drives linked to the target computer by a USB or FireWire connection. The data is copied from one drive to the other for transport. Under the direction of an attorney, the data collection technician travels around the country with an assortment of portable hard drives gathering responsive data from laptops, workstations, network servers and PDAs. At the rate of $300 per hour for data collection, this can get expensive quickly. The data collected is downloaded to a central repository and processed by experienced EDD vendors for production online or “blow back” to paper. There are serious problems with the current collection methodology. 1. Key metadata (including creation, modified and accessed dates of the targeted data) is changed when copying between hard drives. 2. Copying of files often destroys ownership information. If it is necessary to determine, at a later time, who created or had access to a document, this information is tracked by the operating system and is not available unless the collection is done in a proper forensic manner. 3. There is no easy way to verify that the data copied has not been changed during the collection process. 4. The original file location and path of the target data must be manually documented by the collector for future reference. 5. Exact metrics on the type and amount of data that will be collected is usually unknown until the data is in the hands of the processing vendor unless special software is loaded onto the subject drive. 6. If additional data is located or if data is lost during the transfer process, the collector must revisit the custodian and try again. 7. Gathering data using a portable hard drive can be problematic because of compatibility issues and the risk of damaging or destroying evidence on the target computer. 8. The data collected onto a portable hard drive should be encrypted and properly protected for transport. 9. Forensic examination may be necessary to recover deleted files in certain cases, which requires additional travel time and costs. Data collection using portable hard drives is costly, inefficient, disruptive, inaccurate and not a forensically sound way to collect responsive data in important high-profile cases. The courts will soon require the same methodology and accountability demanded in computer forensic examinations. This is important because more than 90 percent of the documents now collected in Hart-Scott-Rodino second requests are electronic. Millions of pages of electronic evidence are collected in an average merger. Accuracy and accountability in the collection process is critical because of the importance of electronic evidence. STANDARDS As EDD develops and matures, so do the standards in data collection. As you evaluate vendors, here are some factors to look for:

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2019 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.