Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
Consumer contracts that require private arbitration instead of the courts cannot burden the plaintiff with expensive costs, a California appellate court ruled Tuesday. In a unanimous decision, the court found that any initial arbitration filing fees must comport with a consumer's ability to pay the fees. The ruling appeared to call into question the standard rules of the American Arbitration Association, which were at issue in the case.
December 12, 2003 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS