Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
In a ruling with broad ramifications for employers, a New Jersey appeals court recently held that public policy prevents an employer from terminating an employee based solely on that employee's refusal to sign a noncompete agreement. Aside from having to deal with the challenge of crafting restrictive covenants that will survive judicial scrutiny, employers now may expose themselves to liability for insisting on such clauses.
September 19, 2003 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS