Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
The existence of an oral contract cannot be legally established to successfully support a summary judgment motion when the evidence that the contract was formed consists almost solely of testimony from a former employee of the nonmoving party, the Philadelphia Common Pleas Court ruled. The ruling denied Calbar Inc.'s motion for partial summary judgment on its claim that Andrews Sprinkler Co. had breached an oral contract.
September 08, 2003 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS