Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
A $521 million patent infringement verdict against Microsoft Corp. -- the largest of 2003 to date -- may have been the result of what jurors didn't hear, Microsoft lawyers say. According to the parties, the judge held a hearing, without the jury present, to determine the weight of Microsoft's evidence of "prior art," and then declined to let the question go to the jury. Microsoft lawyers will likely appeal the issue to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
August 20, 2003 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS