Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
An ERISA insurer's decision to deny disability benefits is not entitled to court deference if it grounded its denial on a "selective" reading of the medical evidence and ignored its own experts' requests for additional testing, a federal judge in Philadelphia ruled. Granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the judge found that the insurer gave too little weight to the findings and opinions of the plaintiff's treating physicians.
May 29, 2003 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS