X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The top government lawyer in the Enron Corp. bankrtupcy case filed a motion in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of New York asking the court to find Credit Suisse First Boston’s head of investment banking, along with six other CSFB executives, in contempt of court if they failed to respond to a subpoena that was issued at the end of February. Neal Batson, who was appointed by the Justice Department as the chief examiner, subpoenaed Adebayo Ogunlesi, CSFB’s head of investment banking, who used to run its global energy group. The subpoena asked him to testify about transactions CSFB created for Enron. Three investment bankers in the energy group, Osmar Abib, Brian McCabe and James Moran, also received subpoenas, as did Curt Launer, an analyst, Mary Beth Mandanas, an associate in the leveraged finance group, and Laurence Nath, a managing director in CSFB’s structured products group. In response to the subpoena, the CSFB executives asked for a delay until they answered a class action suit, Newby v. Enron Corp. But, in a motion filed to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of New York, Batson argues the request is “highly impracticable” and “potentially crippling” to the Enron investigation. He asks the court to find them in contempt if they do not adhere to his earlier subpoena. Key to his argument is timing. Batson says the Newby case will not be resolved for months: “The plaintiffs in the Newby class action are many months away from being prepared to proceed with similar discovery, since they have not even received, let alone begun to analyze, the hundreds of thousands of documents that have been produced.” On the other hand, he contends he “is under a duty to conduct his inquiry promptly and efficiently, and the next interim report is due to be filed in late June 2003.” CSFB spokesman Pen Pendleton said, “The examiner has informed CSFB that he intends to take testimony from eight investment banks including CSFB, and we have and will continue to cooperate with his investigation.” He added: “This is merely a procedural matter regarding the timing of depositions consistent with prior orders from the court.” Cravath, Swaine & Moore’s Julie North, who is representing CSFB in the matter, declined to comment. Copyright �2003 TDD, LLC. All rights reserved.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.