Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
In an attempt to check the growth of a controversial body of law, four 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judges argued Tuesday that a California inmate's conviction should not be overturned because his lawyer was ineffective. Their dissent from a decision not to rehear the case en banc has no precedential value, but it strikes at the heart of a 9th Circuit trend of overturning state court decisions, often because of ineffective counsel claims.
January 30, 2003 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS