Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
An administrative judge has struck down former U.S. Trustee Linda Ekstrom Stanley’s bid to get her job back, ruling that the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board does not have jurisdiction over the matter. Stanley, the government’s top watchdog for bankruptcy cases in much of California and Nevada for the past eight years, was summarily removed from her post in June on orders of U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft. The following month she filed an appeal to the MSPB, the agency which handles adverse action appeals for most executive branch federal employees. In her appeal, Stanley contended that by firing her without cause, the Department of Justice improperly treated her post as a political position. The U.S. Trustees’ five-year term, she maintained, was expressly created by Congress to overlap the four-year presidential term so that the job would not be politicized. But Administrative Judge Philip Arnaudo concluded that the language of the statute creating the trustee position — as well as a 1996 order by then-Attorney General Janet Reno — clearly establish that the trustee position is of a “confidential, policy-determining, policy-making or policy-advocating character,” and is thus subject to at-will removal by the AG. As a result, ruled Arnaudo, Stanley is not entitled to appeal her termination to the MSPB. Howard Moore Jr., an Oakland, Calif., attorney representing Stanley, said he believes the MSPB’s interpretation of the legislative history is incorrect. “The whole history of the creation of the trustee position was to take politics out of the functioning of the trustee’s office,” said Moore. “This puts it right back in there, because now the trustee has to do the bidding of the party that’s in power.” Moore said he would appeal the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Under MSPB rules, a party can appeal to either the D.C. Court of Appeals or a three-member MSPB panel. A separate Equal Employment Opportunity Commission proceeding is under way to address the age and gender discrimination claims in Stanley’s appeal, said Moore. He also noted a possible third prong to the case, in that he was considering filing a suit in U.S. district court on the grounds that Janet Reno’s 1996 order making the trustee a “policy-making” position breaches the separation of powers between the executive and legislative branch.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.