X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
An Arkansas jury has returned a unanimous defense verdict for three major paint manufacturers in a wrongful-death case charging the defendants with causing a man’s death by prolonged exposure to benzene. PPG Industries Inc., Sherwin Williams Co. and E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. were sued by the estate of auto-body repairman Randall Roach for wrongful death related to Roach’s exposure to paints, thinners and solvents containing trace amounts of the carcinogenic chemical. Roach’s estate claimed that exposure to the defendants’ products over 22 years caused him to develop acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), from which he died at age 44. The suit initially named six defendants. Manufacturers 3M Co. and W.M. Barr & Co. and distributor Auto Body Supply Inc. all settled before trial for undisclosed amounts. The trial went forward against the remaining three defendants on a theory of strict products liability that included claims of design defect and failure to warn. The estate alleged that the products were defective because they contained benzene and that the defendants failed to warn of the link between benzene and AML. According to DuPont attorney Andrew Schirrmeister, the defendants argued that the amount of benzene in their products was less than 0.1 percent, the maximum allowed by OSHA. The defense also argued that Roach suffered from an AML subtype not usually associated with benzene exposure; that he suffered no chromosomal damage, another indicator of benzene exposure; and that the 10-year latency period of benzene exposure did not match his chronology because Roach had allegedly been exposed to benzene for 22 years. Roach’s estate asked the jury for $1 million per defendant in punitives, $3.4 million in hedonic damages and unspecified damages for 11 family members. James R. Miller, lead counsel for Sherwin Williams and PPG, said there would have been “great implications for the paint industry” if the Nov. 14 verdict “had been rendered in the plaintiff’s favor.” Roach’s lawyer, D’Juana Parks of Beaumont, Texas’ Provost & Umphrey, said she plans to move for a new trial based on the exclusion of testimony from Roach’s treating physician and on not being allowed to submit a negligence claim to the jury. Parks tried the case with partner J. Keith Hyde and associate Rodney Barnwell.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.