Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

“It’s unusual for the National Labor Relations Act to be this effective in terms of getting money to people,” said Hartford, Conn., plaintiffs’ employment lawyer Thomas W. Meiklejohn, who brokered a record settlement on behalf of former Allied Signal employees. More than 500 defense workers at the former Allied Signal engine plant in Stratford, Conn., earlier this month took home the largest National Labor Relations Board settlement in New England history — a total of $17.6 million in severance benefits. Under the agreement, which upheld a cherished labor law principle, the workers’ individual pension and severance increases will range from about $2,000 for new hires up to $56,000 for veteran workers. Thomas W. Meiklejohn, of Hartford’s Adler, Livingston, Pulda, Meiklejohn & Kelly, represented the United Auto Workers union in litigation and negotiations. He called upon the so-called Katz doctrine, set out by the U.S. Supreme Court 40 years ago, which maintains the basic benefits of a labor contract until new contract negotiations reach an impasse. But Edward Bosik, vice president of labor relations for Allied’s successor company, Honeywell Inc., contended the workers could have had virtually the same settlement five years earlier. The case began in 1996, when Allied Signal announced it was closing the Stratford plant, a longtime source of engines for Army tanks and aircraft. Allied merged with Honeywell, Inc., the following year. It contended the employees couldn’t claim the severance from the expired contract. After an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, the workers were deemed entitled to their severance package on the basis of NLRB v. Katz, a 1962 U.S. Supreme Court precedent. Since the circuit court ruling was handed down in June 2000, a separate issue has kept the case in negotiations until it settled on Oct. 3. Originally, about 50 workers had chosen to retire early when they got news of the plant’s closing. However, Meiklejohn said, if those workers had known they “could have gotten an extra $30,000 to $50,000 for waiting for a layoff slip, they would have waited. “More than half of them retired in June, when the company said they were doing away with the severance benefits. The company ultimately agreed to pay the severance benefits to all those people,” he said, adding, “It’s a great settlement — more than 100 percent.” LABOR LAW STRENGTH The remedies available under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) are often less powerful than those available to nonunion workers with constitutional claims, Meiklejohn said. But in this case, unionized workers had a clear-cut legal advantage.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.