Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

A Georgia Supreme Court case between an attorney and his former lawyer over possession of a memo could define the scope of the work-product privilege. The high court, which granted certiorari in the case on Oct. 3, already appears divided over the issues, one of which is whether a document that wasn’t prepared in anticipation of litigation can get work-product privilege. Chief Justice Norman S. Fletcher, Presiding Justice Leah Ward Sears and Justice Carol W. Hunstein dissented in the decision to grant cert. Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers v. Henry, No. S02C1248. The underlying dispute between the parties arose two years ago. Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers partner James T. McDonald Jr. and his courtroom opponent, Wade K. Copeland of Carlock, Copeland, Semler & Stair, allegedly discussed the merits of a motion for sanctions and attorney fees for frivolous litigation that Copeland had filed on behalf of a client in Gwinnett Superior Court against McDonald’s client, Athens lawyer J. Hue Henry. Henry claimed his lawyer told him Copeland admitted filing the sanctions motion for spite, and promptly filed his own sanctions claim against Copeland. When McDonald refused to produce a memo he’d created about the conversation at issue, which Henry wanted to use to support his case, Henry sued him in Fulton Superior Court. Last year, Judge Alice D. Bonner ruled that McDonald did not have to give Henry the document. But in the underlying Gwinnett case, Judge Michael C. Clark ruled that McDonald should hand over the memo.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.