X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

In the summer of 1969, on a farm in Woodstock, N.Y., Richie Havens performed the song “Freedom.” His beautiful lament became the refrain for a generation. His performance also coincided with the birth of computer-assisted legal research. CALR, in turn, signaled the freeing of legal research from the constraints of traditional hard copy resources. CALR itself has evolved from a system limited by software to the almost limitless freedom of the Internet. The Internet is my frontier. I’m too young for the frontier of American West and too old to explore the frontier of space. I have, however, grown up with the computer revolution. I love the Internet frontier, the freedom of ideas that it allows, its frontier anarchy. I love the way the Internet allows me to distribute information in a robust, cost-effective manner. But I fear the challenges that are endangering my new frontier. Jonathan Zittrain, professor of entrepreneurial studies at Harvard Law School and co-founder of Harvard’s Berkman Center for Internet and Society, recently gave a presentation entitled “Barbed Wire on the Electronic Frontier: Private Sheriffs and Their Private Weapons.” He addressed the effects of federal legislation, its private remedies and court interpretation on the electronic frontier. I agree with his thesis and his fears of private sheriffs and private weapons, but I also fear the effects of our public sheriffs and public weapons. Today, the Internet is being challenged by not only federal but state legislative initiatives. These challenges go directly to the public’s right to obtain information in a cost-effective manner. As a librarian, I am not fearful of change. We constantly address change. We have downsized collections to reflect the use of the computer-generated format. We have structured our budgets around public and private vendor distribution of computer-assisted legal research material. The amount of information, and the speed at which we can serve our users, has also increased. We live in an exciting world where small, low-cost enterprises can and do compete with megacorporations. Electronic material is not governed by the same rules of production that limited the distribution of information in the past. Today, distribution of information is limited only by the creativity of the individuals providing the information. This, however, may not always be true. The Internet is under attack not from terrorists but from well-meaning governmental officials and their lobbyists. Under the guise of protecting competition, these individuals are limiting competition. The individuals in question want or claim to protect private vendors by limiting the competition of public providers. An example of this proposed legislation is that drafted by the American Legislative Exchange Counsel (www.alec.org/). It claims to be “a bi-partisan membership association for conservative state law makers who shared a common belief in limited government, free markets, federalism, and individual liberty … .” I agree with those professed beliefs in limited government, free markets, federalism and individual liberty. I do not, however, agree with their proposed model legislation as an answer. Terry Lane, in “States Considering Bills to Limit Government Role in E-Commerce” on May 17, 2002, cites Ohio House Bill HB 482 (the Electronics Government Securities Act), which will, if adopted, create a review mechanism that any government entity would have to clear before it could launch an Internet initiative that would compete with the private sector. This and similar bills based on ALEC model legislation have been introduced in six other states: Mississippi, Missouri, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina and Tennessee. Lane avers that these legislative initiatives are designed to encourage competition. I believe that this is untrue and that this proposal is “conservative” in the truest sense of the word. This model legislation is based on a fear of change, a fear of competition, and a protection of current players over new public players. As currently drafted, Ohio HB 482 would “prohibit a government agency from providing duplicative or competing electronic commerce services with the private sector unless the government agency complies with procedures established by the Act.” Subsection (C) of the proposed legislation provides: “‘Electronic commerce services’ mean services relating to commercial activity that are the same as, similar to, or overlap information technology based services provided to the public by two or more competing private enterprises. Electronic commerce services includes services made in connection with the transaction completed over a computer network, such as the buying of goods or services over the Internet.” Subsection (E) of the legislation provides “government agency means either of the following: (1) a state agency as defined in Section 117.01 of the Revised Code or (2) a similar agency of a county, township, municipal corporation, or other political subdivision of this state.” These are very broad parameters. Those services and those agencies then come under some extremely strict guidelines as to what they can provide. Finally, with government material becoming easily accessible to the public, legislation such as this proposed legislation will strangle the public’s right to access. (See: Ohio government Web site, www.lsc.state.oh.us/.)

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.