A lawyer who was sanctioned for discovery violations and later lost a case when the court barred him from presenting critical expert witnesses should have known his client would have "no other recourse but to file a legal malpractice suit, if she lost the appeal," a federal judge in Philadelphia has ruled. Judge Robert F. Kelly's ruling enforced a "prior knowledge" exclusion in a "claims made" legal malpractice policy.
September 16, 2002 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
This conference brings together the industry's most influential & knowledgeable real estate executives from the net lease sector.
Consulting magazine is proud to recognize this unique group of movers & shakers at our annual Rising Stars of Profession awards.
BenefitsPro Broker Expo will help attendees prepare for new issues, embrace new challenges and find new solutions.
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
Duane Morris LLP has an opening in its Houston office for a corporate associate to join its growing practice. The ideal candidate will hav...
Morrison Mahoney LLP seeks a civil litigation insurance defense attorney for its New York City office. Areas of Concentration: ...
Aaronson Rappaport Feinstein & Deutsch, LLP mourns the loss of cofounder and original Managing Partner, Mark B. Feinstein.
Lawyers of Distinction would like to announce...
Snyder Sarno D'Aniello Maceri & daCosta would like to announce that...