X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A divorced man cannot have visitation rights to see his former dog Barney, because state law does not allow visitation rights to personal property, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has ruled. “In seeking ‘shared custody’ and a ‘visitation’ arrangement, appellant appears to treat Barney, a dog, as a child,” Judge Frank J. Montemuro wrote. “Despite the status owners bestow on their pets, Pennsylvania law considers dogs to be personal property.” The court said allowing Anthony Desanctis to visit Barney would be creating an arrangement analogous to visiting a table or a lamp. The court’s decision in Desanctis v. Pritchard affirmed the ruling of the Chester County trial court. Desanctis and Lynda Pritchard were married in 1991 and divorced in October 2000. During their marriage they purchased Barney from the SPCA. As part of their divorce, they entered into an agreement “that purported to be a property settlement, but dealt primarily with Barney’s future.” The agreement, which was never incorporated into the divorce decree, provides that Pritchard would get full custody of Barney. The agreement also provided an arrangement allowing Desanctis to visit with Barney. However, Pritchard moved to Bucks County, Pa., in March 2000 and no longer allowed Desanctis to visit with Barney. Desanctis filed suit in May 2001, asking the trial court to grant shared custody of the dog. The trial court dismissed the complaint, and Desanctis appealed. In the appeal, Montemuro said the agreement between Pritchard and Desanctis explicitly awarded the property, Barney, to Pritchard. “Appellant … overlooks the fact that any terms set forth in the agreement are void to the extent that they attempt to award custodial visitation with or shared custody of personal property,” Montemuro wrote. “The result is clearly not contemplated by the statute.” “By the clear and unambiguous terms of the agreement, Barney and his social schedule belong exclusively to appellee.” President Judge Joseph A. Del Sole and Judge Debra M. Todd joined Montemuro in the unanimous decision. Yardley, Pa., attorneys Jennifer C. Etzrodt and John M. Larason represented Pritchard. West Chester, Pa., lawyer John S. Carnes represented Desanctis.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.