Overturning a $68 million verdict, a divided 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday that office supply giant 3M did not violate antitrust laws in its competitive efforts in the transparent tape market because it never priced its products below cost. A dissenting judge complained that the ruling in the case, brought by Ontario, Canada's LePage's Inc., would "weaken Section 2 of the Sherman Act to the point of impotence."
January 14, 2002 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS