Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The fate of Napster could be decided today when an appeals court in San Francisco is expected to rule on the controversial music-swapping service that has taken the world by storm. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a brief notice on its Web site Friday announcing that a three-judge panel would issue its ruling Monday. The panel has been reviewing a lower court opinion that effectively would have shut Napster down. The appeals court prevented that order from taking effect until it had a chance to review the injunction. The record industry contends in a lawsuit filed in December 1999 that Napster, which enables millions of users to download songs for free, infringes upon the copyrights of labels and musicians. The Big Five record labels, which include Bertelsmann’s BMG, Universal, Warner, EMI and Sony, are requesting a ruling that would shut Napster down permanently. U.S. District Judge Marilyn Hall Patel said in July that the labels were highly likely to attain this goal, and ordered Napster to cease trading copyrighted songs as the matter proceeded. The appeals court ruling stayed that order. With almost no marketing, Napster has become a phenomenon, claiming 50 million enthusiastic subscribers. The service threatens to turn the decades-old recording industry on its head, by introducing a fundamentally new way for musicians to distribute their music. So far, Napster has not figured out a way to charge users for the music they download, a shortcoming that has led to charges that the swapping service violates copyrights. Napster recently entered into a deal with BMG, whereby BMG will give Napster access to its entire catalog if the service can figure out how to charge its customers, possibly in the form of monthly subscription fees. Friday’s appeals court notice did not indicate how the panel would rule. If the court affirms the earlier ruling, Napster could be forced to shut down as early as today. Alternatively, the appeals court could decide to overturn the ruling. It could also send the decision back to Patel for further guidance. Related Articles from The Industry Standard: Napster to Launch Paid Service This Summer Napster Makes Music-Shopping Easier Let the Music Play Copyright � 2001 The Industry Standard

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.