Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
The U.S. Supreme Court on May 29 repudiated the so-called catalyst theory for obtaining attorneys' fee awards. The high court held that a "prevailing party," eligible for attorneys' fee awards, does not mean a litigant whose suit achieved its aim by inducing a voluntary change in the defendant's conduct. And some litigators fear the ruling means trouble for the economics of public interest litigation.
June 05, 2001 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS