Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A Florida businessman has accused South Carolina-based Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough and Glenn W. Sturm, an Atlanta partner with the firm, of malpractice and fraud. It’s a case of an attorney “wearing too many hats,” says Bernard H. Dempsey Jr. of Orlando’s Dempsey & Sasso. Dempsey represents John P. Kelly, former chief executive officer of Florida-based M2Direct, who filed suit against Nelson Mullins and Sturm in a federal court in Tampa, Fla., in June. The case stems from Sturm’s involvement as M2Direct board vice chairman, corporate secretary and investor at the same time he represented Kelly on personal matters and served as the company’s outside counsel, according to the complaint. Dempsey says Sturm should have recognized that his representation of Kelly could conflict with his personal stake in the company. M2Direct, a Tampa, Fla., marketing firm, filed for Chapter 11 protection from creditors under the federal bankruptcy code in April 2000. Kelly alleges that Sturm orchestrated his ouster as CEO in a board meeting on June 21, 1999, at the offices of the law firm. The complaint accuses Sturm of making negligent misrepresentations of fact and committing legal malpractice and fraud. Kelly v. Nelson, Mullins, No. 01-CV-1176 (M.D. Fla. June 20, 2001). Dempsey says he’ll ask for damages of more than $25 million. Sturm heads Nelson Mullins’ 65-lawyer corporate group and is a member of its five-partner executive committee. Sturm’s lawyer, Guy M. Burns of Tampa’s Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, denies his client had any role in the dismissal of Kelly as CEO. He says Sturm rendered adequate legal services and that the dispute is the result of Kelly’s unhappiness over the company’s financial problems. In September, Nelson Mullins and Sturm filed motions to dismiss the case for lack of personal jurisdiction and failure to state a cause of action. The parties are waiting on U.S. District Judge James D. Whittemore of the Middle District of Florida to rule on those motions.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.