Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A federal judge in Los Angeles approved a settlement Friday designed to keep electric utility company Southern California Edison out of bankruptcy by forcing customers to continue paying higher rates imposed last May for at least two more years. The deal also would require Edison shareholders to forego $1.2 billion worth of dividends over three years. U.S. District Judge Ronald S.W. Lew called the settlement “fair, adequate and reasonable to the parties, the shareholders and to the public and is not a bailout by any means.” The deal, which was secretly negotiated between lawyers for the utility and the California Public Utilities Commission, settles a lawsuit filed by Edison last fall. It is intended to allow Edison to pay off an estimated $3.3 billion of its more than $6 billion debt, and keep it from following Pacific Gas and Electric, the state’s largest utility, into bankruptcy. Edison attorney Steve Pickett praised the judge’s decision, calling it “a very critical first step necessary to create the cash flow to pay creditors.” He said it was too early to say when the company would start paying its larger creditors. The possibility still exists that smaller creditors could seek to force the utility into involuntary bankruptcy, Pickett said. PG&E and Edison blame their financial woes on California’s 1996 deregulation law that prevented them from passing on skyrocketing wholesale power costs to ratepayers. The state stepped in, buying billions of dollars in power for the credit-starved utilities. Earlier this year, the commission approved a $5 billion electricity rate hike, the biggest in California history. Regulators then boosted rates by as much as 80 percent for residential customers who use the most power. Gary Cohen, a lawyer for the PUC, said the deal should allow Edison to pay its debt by the end of 2003. The commission will retain authority over Edison in contrast to a reorganization proposed by PG&E to cope with its financial troubles. “What we’re doing is trying to get SoCal Edison financially healthy so it can resume purchasing power for its customers and we can get the state out of the power-buying business,” Cohen said. Consumer groups have complained that the commission violated state law by secretly working out the settlement without public hearings. Reliant Energy Services and Mirant Corporation, which are owed more than $260 million by Edison for power purchases, also criticized the agreement for being “silent about the mechanics of payment to creditors.” They want more time to study the proposal. An attorney for the Utilities Reform Network, a San Francisco-based consumer advocacy group, promised an appeal of what he called an “incredible incursion of federal jurisdiction on state regulation.” Copyright 2001 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.