Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Altera Corp. won a major victory Thursday in its long-running patent battle against fellow semiconductor giant Xilinx Inc. San Jose, Calif.-based U.S. District Judge James Ware threw out much of a jury verdict against Altera that said the company had infringed on two valid patents held by Xilinx. Ware ruled that one of the patents was invalid and the other was not infringed by Altera. The ruling “is an absolute win” for Altera, said Morrison & Foerster partner James Brosnahan, who represents Altera. He found there was “no evidence to support Xilinx’s position.” “We were disappointed and surprised by the decision,” said Xilinx attorney John Keker, of Keker & Van Nest. “The immediate effect is to turn us from an appellee into an appellant.” He said Xilinx would appeal to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In November, a jury found that Altera infringed two Xilinx patents for reprogramming computer chips. On Thursday, Ware concluded that Altera did not infringe one of the patents, the so-called “Freeman patent.” He denied Altera’s request for a finding that the other patent — known as the “Carter patent” — is non-infringing. “The court concludes that insufficient evidence exists to support the jury’s finding,” that the Freeman patent was infringed by Altera, Ware said. “Altera’s JMOL [motion for judgment as a matter of law] regarding noninfringement of the Freeman patent is thus granted on this basis.” Altera had asked Ware to rule that both patents were invalid and that the company did not infringe on either of them. Ware made a split decision: the Freeman patent is valid, and the Carter is invalid. Altera did not infringe on the Freeman but did on the Carter. Since a company cannot infringe on an invalid patent, the Carter infringement is essentially moot. There was something of a silver lining for Xilinx: The ruling still allows the company to enforce one of the patents — the Freeman — against other competitors. Xilinx sued for infringement in 1993, and Altera countersued. Altera’s complaint is pending before U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel in San Jose. The cutting-edge technology in dispute, known as field programmable gate arrays, is used in everything from cell phone towers to medical imagery devices to satellites. The market for programmable logic devices was $2.6 billion in 1999.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.