X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A U.S. Supreme Court law clerk leaks the outcome of a pending case. He gets caught, and all hell breaks loose. If that sounds like fiction, it was: Brad Meltzer’s 1997 bestseller, “The Tenth Justice.” But long before it was fiction, it was fact. A recent article in the Northwestern University Law Review details, for the first time, the forgotten story of Ashton Embry, the law clerk to Justice Joseph McKenna who resigned in 1919 and was indicted in 1920 for using inside knowledge of a forthcoming opinion to profit on Wall Street. The episode made headlines in Washington, D.C., at the time, but appears not at all in biographies of McKenna, books about the court of that era or even in the memoirs of the late Dean Acheson, who clerked at the court the same year and later became secretary of state. John Owens, himself a former law clerk — and son of another law clerk — wrote the recent article as a labor of love while working at the U.S. Department of Justice. He stumbled onto a brief reference to the case in an old law review article and pursued it by looking at DOJ and Supreme Court files at the National Archives. “I was consumed by it,” says Owens, an associate with Washington, D.C.’s O’Melveny & Myers who leaves the firm later this month for a job as Assistant U.S. Attorney in Los Angeles. “I couldn’t believe no one had written about it.” His historical pursuit led him to old case files and investigative reports, including one memorandum by a young Federal Bureau of Investigation agent named J. Edgar Hoover. A scandal-hungry journalist named Marlen Pew first heard about the scheme and went to Chief Justice Edward White who, according to a later report, wept upon hearing of the scandal visited upon his court. On Dec. 16, 1919, Washington papers reported that a leak from within the court about the outcome of United States v. Southern Pacific Railroad had helped a group of Wall Street speculators. Later that day, Embry, who had been McKenna’s clerk for nearly nine years, resigned to devote himself to a bakery business he had run while serving as clerk. The DOJ convened a grand jury and began an investigation. But from the start, the case against Ashton Embry was flawed. The government’s informant was a shady character, and it had difficulty in locating a law that Embry had actually violated. Insider trading was not yet illegal, and leaking a court opinion early violated the court’s customs but not any statute. Ultimately, Embry and his co-conspirators were indicted for depriving the United States of the “right and privilege” to have Supreme Court decisions handed down as its customs prescribed. The defendants hired a “dream team” of lawyers, proclaimed their innocence and challenged the indictment. But in 1921, the court without comment denied Embry’s appeal of the indictment. There the matter sat until 1929 when, without explanation, the government dismissed the indictment. “The war between the Department and the Dream Team was never fought,” Owens wrote, speculating that the weakness of the government informant among other factors led prosecutors to think they could not win their case before a jury. Owens concludes, as did Hoover, that Embry was guilty as charged. “Too many independent pieces of evidence point in his direction, and he never adequately explained them all away,” Owens wrote. Nonetheless, Embry barely skipped a beat in his career as a baker. He prospered, ultimately running a chain of seven bakeries in the D.C. area until he retired in 1950. In a delicious coda, when Embry died in 1965 he requested that his ashes be scattered on the grounds of the Supreme Court. His son Lloyd, a noted portrait artist, fulfilled the request “under the cover of darkness.” While researching the article, Owens reflected on his own clerkship for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and his father Jack’s for the late Justice Lewis Powell. It would be nearly impossible for a modern-day Supreme Court clerk to do what Embry did, says Owens — although he says he is surprised that lower-court clerks, under less scrutiny, do not give in to temptation more often. The ethical obligations of Supreme Court law clerks today are deeply ingrained, Owens says. “At the Supreme Court now, there is a code of conduct for clerks, and the chief will talk to us about how important confidentiality is,” Owens says. “It is also made clear to the printers, the librarians, who may see an opinion before it is released.” More relevant laws and precedents are also in place, including one that declares the United States’ right to “honest government services.” Says Owens: “I would not want to be the law clerk who tests that law.” Meanwhile Brad Meltzer, who has read Owens’ article, says, “Ashton Embry was the best response for that one Supreme Court clerk who said ‘The Tenth Justice’ could never happen. The funny thing is, I never knew about the Embry case when I wrote ‘The Tenth Justice’ — it came up years later, when the whole Supreme Court clerk lovefest/fascination started. And I thought Ben Addison [his main character] had it rough.”

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.