Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A coalition of business groups and other employers sued Washington state over sweeping new ergonomic rules designed to protect workers from injury. The lawsuit, filed Wednesday in Thurston County Superior Court by Washington Employers Concerned about Regulating Ergonomics, claims the rules written by the state Department of Labor and Industries place a staggering burden on employers for dubious benefits to workers. “This is clearly a case of a state agency abusing its power and pushing through a rule based on political agendas,” said Tom McCabe, president of the Building Industry Association of Washington. State officials contend the regulations — enthusiastically backed by labor unions — are long overdue and could prevent thousands of injuries a year. The labor and industries department has no plans to rescind or revise the regulations, director Gary Moore said. “We’re very confident that the ergonomics rules will reduce workplace injuries and reduce employer costs,” Moore said. The department receives 50,000 claims a year from injured workers, costing employers more than $400 million. “That’s a huge toll of pain and suffering and lost productivity,” Moore said. The rules, to be phased in over six years beginning next July, require employers to identify tasks that are likely to cause back strain, repetitive stress and other injuries to muscles and joints. Businesses — starting with sawmills, construction and other industries that report the highest number of injuries — must take steps to lower the risks by buying new equipment, repositioning existing equipment or providing training on how to avoid injury. Major employer groups say the rules will cost them $725 million a year. The lawsuit also challenges the effectiveness of the ergonomic techniques spelled out in the rules. Proposals to delay implementation of the rules died in the closely divided Legislature this year. Nationally, ergonomic regulations were formulated during the Clinton administration. But Congress repealed them this spring, and Eugene Scalia, nominated by the Bush administration as the U.S. Labor Department’s top lawyer, has called them “quackery” and “junk science.” Copyright 2001 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.