Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A free speech advocacy organization with a history of tackling civil liberties issues in cyberspace has joined the legal defense team of a company sued by Hollywood for fueling the online movie trade. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a group that has represented hackers in the past, will help represent MusicCity, the Nashville, Tenn.-based company sued in Los Angeles federal court last month by several major movie and music companies for copyright infringement. MusicCity distributes a program dubbed Morpheus, seen by the entertainment industry as the “next Napster” for its ability to maintain a growing network of users swapping copyright material online. Napster users logged on to the company’s central servers before a federal court judge ordered the song-sharing service offline. Morpheus is more of a pure peer-to-peer program, which eliminates the need for central servers and routes users directly into its online community. Wednesday afternoon there were 485,000 people logged on the Morpheus network sharing more than 66 million files. During the month of October, Morpheus users and others with similar software, transferred 1.81 billion files over the growing network, according to Webnoize, a company that analyzes digital entertainment industries. The companies suing MusicCity include movie studios MGM, Columbia and Disney along with music companies Sony, Universal and Warner. Motion Picture Association of America president Jack Valenti said at the time the suit was filed, “those named in this suit have sought to profit from works protected by copyright, without obtaining the copyright owner’s permission.” But the San Francisco-based EFF sees a larger crackdown in effect and hopes to defend MusicCity by leaning on court precedent. “Just as the entertainment industry tried to ban the VCR, now it aims to outlaw the technology that is the next killer app of the Internet,” said EFF attorney Robin Gross on Tuesday. Gross was referring to the 1984 U.S. Supreme Court decision that rebuffed the film industry’s unsuccessful attempt to stop the sales of VCRs. The film industry thought movie piracy would run rampant, but the high court found that most people would use VCRs to simply “time-shift,” record television programs for later viewing. Copyright 2001 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.