X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said that the state’s suits against health maintenance organizations were likely to be settled, but that he would oppose judicial oversight of the settlements. Blumenthal sounded off in a philosophical defense of the lawsuits against HMOs in a May 8 debate at the State Capitol, sponsored by the Federalist Society For Law and Public Policy. The state isn’t seeking a penny in damages, only orders that would force some of the state’s top health care providers to obey federal law requiring them to place patients’ interests first, Blumenthal said. The event also featured Yale Law School Professor George L. Priest, who served as an adviser to President Ronald Reagan on privatization of government services. Blumenthal noted that the state has not sued all HMOs, determining that Aetna and United Health Care are already putting pressure on themselves to improve. Physicians Health Services, CIGNA, Anthem Blue Cross and Oxford are the current defendants. Blumenthal said the idea is to enforce the provision of the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act requiring HMOs to “act solely in the interest of their enrollees.” He said that HMOs are “making arbitrary coverage decisions in the interest of controlling costs.” Litigation isn’t ideal, Blumenthal said. “We would much prefer these HMOs do the right thing on their own,” such as eliminating levels of their own bureaucracies and not second-guessing doctors’ decisions. Priest wholeheartedly agreed litigation was “not going to bring real reform to managed care.” He said the medical needs of Blumenthal’s eight representative plaintiffs were “peculiar” cases. Blumenthal resisted having his plaintiffs characterized as “peculiar,” saying they were people with asthma and heart ailments — “people with basic health conditions.” He said that people have different treatment requirements. To cut off Lyme Disease antibiotics after 30 days and to never give intravenous antibiotics in any case “seems to me to be one-size-fits-all principle.” THE SHRIMP BOWL SYNDROME Priest said that part of the difficulty with a pre-paid package deal like a health care plan is that the consumer doesn’t know what he or she will want or need, and when. The pay-in-advance system has its own costs. Priest used the analogy of a cruise ship in which food and drink are paid in advance. People’s natural tendency is to eat and drink more than they normally would have on a pay-as-you-go basis. “Cruise ships are not ignorant of this problem,” he said. They put the shrimp bowl at the end of the buffet table, or limit the number of times it is refilled. For people whose needs differ from the general norm, paying extra for special requirements is not unusual, Priest said. He used the example of homeowners’ policies excluding coin and stamp collections from ordinary coverage. “It’s a feature of every package system we see,” he said, to limit coverage for special circumstances. LOYALTY TO GROUP The ERISA concept that an insurer must act solely in the interest of the enrollees is fine, said Priest, if the term “enrollees” recognizes the group nature of the insured class. “If it were the individual personal interest of each enrollee, our health care costs are going to go through the roof,” he said. Blumenthal contended the HMOs fail to give adequate notice of the procedures for contesting claims and do not have standards that can be ascertained.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.