X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
An unsecured creditors committee charged with pursuing claims for a pair of debtor companies could not maintain its action against a securities underwriter that helped deepen the companies’ insolvency because the underwriters successfully argued that the debtors’ management was equally at fault, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Oct. 9. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. R.F. Lafferty & Co. Inc., No. 00-1157. The committee had sued the underwriter and an accounting firm, alleging that they had falsely certified the financial condition of the debtors — Walnut Equipment Leasing Co. and its subsidiary, the Equipment Leasing Corp. of America — to induce creditors to buy debt instruments that the companies could never honor. The action against the accountant settled, but the underwriter, R.F. Lafferty & Co., raised the defense of “in pari delicto,” stating, in effect, that the debtors were equally guilty. Citing bankruptcy code Section 541, the circuit court said the in pari delicto defense must be evaluated as of the date of the bankruptcy filing, without consideration of post-petition events. One such event was the trustee’s appointment of the committee to pursue claims on the debtors’ behalf. Imputing the corporate officers’ conduct to the debtor companies, the court noted that the committee was acting for the debtors in its pursuit of R.F. Lafferty, and ruled it was barred from doing so by the in pari delicto defense. Though in the absence of controlling Pennsylvania precedent the 3rd Circuit recognized a debtors’ cause of action for deepening insolvency, it rejected the committee’s argument that, as an innocent successor to the wrongdoing management, it should be allowed to pursue the claim on the companies’ behalf. Stuart Melnick, of counsel to New York City’s Tanner Propp, represented R.F. Lafferty & Co. He found part of the dissenting opinion “compelling.” In that dissenting opinion, Judge Robert E. Cowen wrote that the lower court had “inexplicably failed to explain” why it had dismissed the claims against the outside professionals, but not the claims against corporate insiders. Moreover, Cowen opined, under the majority’s logic, all defendants could assert in pari delicto with equal force. Melnick said that while this conclusion was not binding, it could be useful for the remaining defendants. The committee’s lawyer, Barbara Mather, a partner with Philadelphia’s Pepper Hamilton, said, “This case has narrow implications because the court only interpreted Pennsylvania law. The 7th Circuit and 9th Circuit have permitted similar claims in Illinois and California. The 3rd Circuit distinguishes those cases because they involved receivers, not trustees, but the same bankruptcy code language applies to both.” Besides, Mather said, creditors could still sue wrongdoers for their own injuries by bringing a class action. The creditors did so, hiring Philadelphia’s Innelli and Molder to represent them in a class action against R.F. Lafferty and others involved in the scheme. Attorney Michael Molder said that case was settled for $5.8 million last March.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.