X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
An upstate New York judge has denied an attempt by Michael C. Skakel, a member of the Kennedy family in the national spotlight since he was charged last year with a 25-year-old murder, to prohibit his estranged wife from publicly discussing their pending divorce and to cloak the procedures in secrecy. Skakel, the nephew of Robert F. Kennedy, argued that a gag order in his ongoing divorce matter is necessary to protect his criminal fair trial rights. He was charged last year with the slaying of a Greenwich, Conn., teenager, Martha Moxley, in 1975. Moxley was beaten to death with a golf club. Skakel, whose father, Rushton Skakel Sr., is the brother of Ethel Kennedy, the widow of Senator Kennedy, lived across the street from the Moxleys. Supreme Court Justice George L. Cobb of Catskill has ruled that a gag order would impermissibly intrude on the First Amendment free speech rights of Skakel’s estranged spouse, Margot Skakel. Additionally, Cobb refused Skakel’s request to change the caption on Skakel v. Skakel to Anonymous v. Anonymous. In this matter, Greene County case 19-00-9380, Cobb said that in order to overcome the strong presumption of unconstitutionality and qualify for a prior restraint order, there must be “an adequate factual showing that prejudicial pretrial publicity will threaten” Skakel’s Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial. “In the instant case, defendant’s assertions that publicity with respect to the instant matrimonial will deprive him of a fair trial in the murder trial are entirely conclusory and speculative,” Cobb wrote. “There is no factual basis whatsoever for such claims and it does not appear that facts surrounding the instant matrimonial action are likely to have any direct impact on the criminal trial as the parties were not married until more than 15 years after the murder occurred.” Cobb declined to amend the caption, finding that to do so would be pointless since the prior restraint application was denied. Also, he cited the facts that information regarding the commencement of the matrimonial litigation has already been disseminated to the news media, and that the Skakels’ child is only 2 years old and “it is unlikely that maintaining the accurate caption will have any impact whatsoever upon the child.” Michael and Margot Skakel have been married for nine years. They separated in October and are battling over child custody, support and use of the marital residence in Windham, a small town in the Greene County Catskills. A hearing has been scheduled for April 18. Currently at issue in the criminal matter is whether Mr. Skakel should be tried as an adult or a juvenile because of his age at the time of the crime, which was 15. If tried as an adult, he would face a sentence of anywhere from 10 years to life. If tried as a juvenile, he would face no more than four years under the 1975 law. FREE SPEECH RIGHTS Ms. Skakel’s attorney in this matter, Michael J. Grygiel of McNamee, Lochner, Titus & Williams in Albany, N.Y., said his client is “extremely pleased” with the ruling. Grygiel said the decision adds to a small body of case law applying free speech and First Amendment principles in the context of a matrimonial proceeding. He said there is limited authority indicating that a gag order may be appropriate in divorce cases, particularly where children are involved. Cobb cited Matter of Adams v. Tersillo, 245 AD2d 446, 1997, in stating that “a complete prohibition on all discussion is almost always improper.” He also said prior restraint is appropriate under People v. Fioretti, 135 Misc2d 541 (1987), a Bronx County case, only when “there are serious and imminent threats to the fairness of the trial.” Gossip columnists reported last month that Ms. Skakel, a golf pro, is negotiating with an agent to write a tell-all book of her life with Mr. Skakel. Grygiel confirmed that Ms. Skakel is negotiating a book deal. Mr. Skakel’s attorney is Jean M. Mahserjian of Clifton Park, N.Y.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.