Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Albert Foer, head of the American Antitrust Institute, aims to root out monopolists and other anticompetitive predators wherever they might be lurking. Now his Washington, D.C.-based antitrust think tank is shining its searchlight on a new culprit: the American Bar Association. Foer, a former Federal Trade Commission lawyer who founded the nonprofit AAI in 1998, claims that the ABA’s restrictions on lawyer-accountant mergers are a clear attempt to extend the bar’s monopoly over legal services and thwart an innovation that consumers want. Specifically, he argues that the ABA’s proposal to only permit multidisciplinary practices (MDPs) controlled by lawyers is anticompetitive — and a potential violation of antitrust laws. In a study released in early February, the AAI calls the ABA’s proposed restrictions “bad for the consuming public, bad for public policy, and in the long run bad for the legal profession.” Foer laid out his case against the ABA to reporter Douglas McCollam.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.