X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant. STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. Attorney General ELIOT SPITZER, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Counterclaim-Plaintiff, vs. ELIOT SPITZER, Attorney General of the State of New York, in his official capacity, et al., Counterclaim-Defendants. Civil Action No. 98-1232 (TPJ) MICROSOFT CORPORATION’S PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT This cause having come to be heard, and this Court having fully considered the evidence and arguments, and having filed its Findings of Fact and its Conclusions of Law, it is hereby Ordered, Declared, Adjudged and Decreed: 1. Definitions. As used in this Decree: a. “Operating System” means the software that, inter alia, (i) controls the allocation and usage of hardware resources, such as scheduling the microprocessor time and allocating random access memory, (ii) provides a platform for the development of applications and other software products by exposing services to such products through various Programming Interfaces, and (iii) contains a user interface. Windows 98 is an example of an Operating System. b. “Windows Operating System” means the binary software code of 95, Windows 98, Windows 2000 Professional and their Operating Systems, including the Operating System code-named “Millennium” that is currently under development. c. “Platform Software” means an Operating System or other software that exposes services to applications developers through Application Interfaces. d. “Personal Computer” means a computer that is designed for use by one person at a time (as opposed to a server designed for use by more one person at a time) that uses a video display and keyboard whether or not the video display and keyboard are actually included) and that contains an Intel x86 or Intel x86-compatible microprocessor. Servers, television set-top boxes, hand-held computers, game consoles, telephones, pagers and personal digital assistants are examples of products that are not Personal Computers within the meaning of this definition. e. “Default Browser” means the Web browsing software that is configured to launch automatically (i.e., by “default”) to display Web pages transmitted over the Internet or an intranet bearing the .htm when the end user has not invoked other Web browsing software for this purpose. f. “Original Equipment Manufacturer” or “OEM” means the manufacturer or assembler of a Personal Computer. OEM does not include a manufacturer of motherboards or other isolated components of a Personal Computer. g. “Independent Software Vendor” or “ISV” means the subsidiary, division or other operating unit of any software publisher not affiliated with that is engaged in developing and marketing software products that call upon APIs exposed by Microsoft Platform Software. h. “Application Programming Interfaces” or “APIs” mean programming interfaces that are directly invoked by an application or middleware to obtain services from Platform Software. i. “Technical Information” means information regarding the identification means to invoke APIs exposed by Microsoft Platform Software that is necessary to enable ISVs to design software products that will run on Microsoft Platform Software, and does not include information about the underlying implementation of those APIs. j. “Intellectual Property Rights” mean copyrights, patents, trademarks trade secrets. k. “License Agreement” means any intellectual property license pursuant to which Microsoft authorizes an OEM to preinstall any Windows System on Personal Computers manufactured by such OEM. 2. Violations. Microsoft violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. � 2, by unlawfully maintaining a monopoly in the worldwide market for Intel-compatible PC operating systems.” Microsoft also violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act by attempting to monopolize the market for Web browsing software. Microsoft violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. � 1, by unlawfully tying its Web browsing software to its Windows 95 and Windows 98 operating systems. Microsoft also violated the following state law provisions: Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code �� 16720, 16726, 17200; Conn. Gen. Stat. �� 35-26, 35-27, 35-29; D.C. Code 28-4502, 28-4503; Fla. Stat. chs. 501.204(1), 542.18, 542.19; 740 Ill. Comp. Stat. ch. 10/3; Iowa Code �� 553.4, 553.5; Kan. Stat. �� 50-101 et seq.; Ky. Rev. Stat. �� 367.170, 367.175; La. Rev. Stat. 51:122, 51.123, 51:1405; Md. Com. Law II Code Ann. � 11-204; Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 93A, � 2; Mich. Comp. Laws �� 445.772, 445.773; Minn. Stat. � 325D.52; N.M. Stat. �� 57-1-1, 57-1-2; N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law � 340; N.C. Gen. Stat. �� 75-1.1, 75-2.1; Ohio Rev. Code 1331.01, 1331.02; Utah Code � 76-10-914; W. Va. Code �� 47-18-3, -18-4; Wis. Stat. � 133.03(1)-(2). 3. Judgment. Judgment is entered for the United States on its second, third and fourth claims for relief in Civil Action No. 1232 and for the states on their first, second, fourth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth, eleventh, twelfth, thirteenth, fourteenth, fifteenth, sixteenth, seventeenth, eighteenth, nineteenth, twentieth, twenty-first, twenty-second, twenty-fourth, twenty-fifth and twenty-sixth claims for in Civil Action No. 98-1233. The first claim for relief in Civil Action No. 98-1232 and the fifth claim for relief in Civil Action No. 98-1233 are dismissed with prejudice. 4. OEM License Agreements. Microsoft is enjoined from: a. canceling or refusing to grant a License Agreement to any OEM because the OEM ships or promotes non-Microsoft Platform Software or exercises any of the options provided in paragraph 4.b of this Decree, provided that the OEM does not infringe Microsoft’s Intellectual Property Rights in exercising those options; b. entering into any License Agreement or asserting any claim of right under copyright law that would prohibit any OEM from: (i) displaying icons for non-Microsoft Platform Software on the Windows Operating System desktop (provided that the icons do not cover the whole or any part of the icons by Microsoft), (ii) offering its own Internet sign-up process in the initial boot sequence of the Windows Operating System that includes the option to make non-Microsoft Web browsing software the Default Browser on a new Personal Computer and to remove the Internet Explorer icon from the Windows Operating System desktop if the end user elects to make non-Microsoft Web browsing software the Default Browser, (iii) deleting the Internet Explorer icon from the Windows Operating System desktop and Start menu in copies of Windows Operating Systems that the OEM pre-installs on its Personal Computers, or (iv) configuring non-Microsoft Web browsing software as the Browser on Personal Computers sold by the OEM; provided that nothing in paragraph 4.b shall be interpreted to limit Microsoft’s ability to develop, and license to OEMs, Operating Systems that invoke Web browsing functionality built into such products to display (a) information presented in the Operating System itself (e.g., Help files), (b) information presented in Web sites that enhance the functionality of the Operating System (e.g., Windows Update), or (c) Web pages transmitted over the Internet or an intranet that the content provider has developed in a manner that requires such Web browsing functionality for the content to be displayed properly or at all; c. terminating the License Agreement of any of the 20 largest OEMs (as by annual volume of Windows Operating Systems that they ship) without having first given the OEM written notice of the reason for the proposed termination and not less than 30 days’ opportunity to cure. 5. Promotion on the Windows Operating System Desktop. Microsoft is enjoined from entering into a contract in which Microsoft agrees to any product or service of the other party to the contract on the Windows Operating System desktop, in a folder on the Windows Operating System desktop, in the Active Desktop or in the initial boot sequence of the Windows Operating System in exchange for the other party’s agreeing to limit the amount of any non-Microsoft Platform Software distributed by that party. 6. ISVs’ Access to Technical Information. Microsoft is enjoined from: a. denying any bona fide ISV timely and complete access to such Technical Information as is provided through any software development program that Microsoft makes available to the software development community at large to assist in the creation of applications for Windows Operating Systems, subject to space limitations (in the case of events like design previews and professional developers conferences) and to the ISV’s complying with normal and customary terms (such as payment of applicable fees and observance of conditions protecting Microsoft’s Intellectual Property Rights); and b. in the event that Microsoft furnishes Technical Information to an ISV in addition to that referred to in paragraph 6.a, conditioning the release of such Technical Information on the ISV’s agreeing not to write Platform Software, or applications for such Platform Software, that compete with any Microsoft software, provided that Microsoft may condition the release of Technical Information to an ISV on the ISV’s agreeing not to infringe any of Microsoft’s Intellectual Property Rights and agreeing to commercially reasonable measures (including reasonable confidentiality agreements) for protection of such rights. 7. Release of Products for Non-Microsoft Platform Software. Microsoft is enjoined from conditioning the timely release of a software product that is designed to run on non-Microsoft Platform Software and that is ready for commercial release on an agreement by the vendor of that Platform Software to limit the development, manufacture, distribution or promotion of Platform Software that competes with Platform Software offered by Microsoft. 8. Licensing of Predecessor Operating Systems. Microsoft shall, when it releases a major Windows Operating System such as Windows 95 or Windows 98, continue for three years to make the predecessor Windows Operating System available for licensing at a royalty no higher than the existing royalty to any OEM that desires such a license. 9. Effective Date. Microsoft shall begin to comply with the provisions of this Decree within 45 days of its entry, provided that Microsoft may seek a stay of this Decree pending any appeal of this Court’s judgment. 10. Monitoring of Compliance. To determine or secure compliance with this Decree, duly authorized representatives of the plaintiffs shall, upon written request of the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, on reasonable notice given to Microsoft at its principal office, subject to any lawful privilege, be permitted: a. access during normal office hours to inspect and copy all books, ledgers, accounts, correspondence, memoranda and other documents and records in the possession, custody or control of Microsoft (which may have counsel present) relating to any matters contained in this Decree; b. subject to the reasonable convenience of Microsoft and without restraint or interference from it, to interview officers, employees or agents of Microsoft (who may have counsel present) regarding any matters contained in this Decree; and c. to require Microsoft to submit written reports, under oath if requested, regarding any matters contained in this Decree. No information or documents obtained by the means provided in this paragraph shall be divulged by any of the plaintiffs except in the course of legal proceedings to which one or more of the plaintiffs is a party, or for the purpose of securing compliance with this Decree, or as otherwise required by law. Nor shall anything in this paragraph require Microsoft to waive any applicable privilege or immunity, including, without limitation, the attorney-client privilege and work product protection. If, when information or documents are furnished by it, Microsoft identifies in material to which a claim of privilege may be asserted under Rule 26(c)(7) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and marks each page of such material “Subject to claim of protection under Rule 26(c)(7) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,” plaintiffs must give ten days’ notice to Microsoft prior to divulging such material in any legal proceeding (other than a grand jury proceeding) to which Microsoft is not a party. 11. Costs and Attorneys’ Fees. Microsoft shall pay the plaintiff states’ reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees. 12. Term. This Decree shall terminate four years from its effective date. Until termination, jurisdiction over this case is retained for the purpose enabling any of the parties to apply to this Court at any time for such further orders and directions as may be appropriate for the correction, construction or carrying out of this Decree, for the earlier termination of the Decree, or to set aside the Decree and to conduct further proceedings if future developments justify that course in the appropriate enforcement of the Sherman Act. – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - Thomas Penfield Jackson U.S. District Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 10th day of May, 2000, I caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing Microsoft Corporation’s Proposed Final Judgment to be served by facsimile and by overnight courier upon: Phillip R. Malone, Esq. Antitrust Division U.S. Department of Justice 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Room 10-0101 San Francisco, California 94102 Fax: (415) 436-6687 Kevin J. O’Connor, Esq. Office of the Attorney General of Wisconsin P.O. Box 7857 123 West Washington Avenue Madison, Wisconsin 53703-7957 Fax: (608) 267-2223 Christine Rosso, Esq. Chief, Antitrust Bureau Illinois Attorney General’s Office 100 West Randolph Street, 13th Floor Chicago, Illinois 60601 Fax: (312) 814-2549 And by facsimile and by hand upon: Richard L. Schwartz, Esq. Deputy Chief, Antitrust Bureau New York State Attorney General’s Office 120 Broadway, Suite 2601 New York, New York 10271 Fax: (212) 416-6015

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.