Civil court is not the place to judge whether a Roman Catholic priest committed a breach of fiduciary duty when he entered into a sexual relationship with a woman he was counseling, an appeals court has ruled.

By a 3-1 majority, the New York Appellate Division, Second Department, said in an unsigned opinion that the plaintiff’s claim that the priest betrayed his role as a spiritual counselor was really a complaint of clergy malpractice, which the court ought not to touch, since it may become entangled with ecclesiastical doctrine.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]