CLOSEClose Law.com Menu
 
X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A pro-Microsoft lobbying group filed a proposal on Tuesday in Washington, D.C., calling on U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson to reject the government’s suggestion that he break up Microsoft in order to “remedy” the software giant’s multiple violations of federal and state antitrust law. The Association for Competitive Technology (ACT) said the government’s April 28 proposal to split Microsoft into an operating-systems company and a software-applications company would harm both consumers and other software developers “as much or more than Microsoft.” The group urged Jackson to seek testimony from software developers before making his final ruling. In its May 10 response to the government, Microsoft labeled the breakup proposal an unnecessarily radical departure from basic antitrust law and proposed a set of relatively mild restrictions on some of its business practices. Should Jackson decide to officially consider the government’s breakup proposal, Microsoft’s lawyers said they will ask for several months’ worth of unspecified new-evidence discovery, depositions and courtroom-witness testimony. In January, ACT filed an official brief supporting Microsoft’s “proposed conclusions of law” in the case. From the looks of Jackson’s April 3 conclusions, ACT’s prior brief didn’t have too much effect — Jackson found that Microsoft repeatedly violated the Sherman Antitrust Act and various state antitrust statutes by bullying the software industry into illegally preserving its dominant Windows market share. It’s not clear whether Jackson will formally accept Tuesday’s unsolicited brief, a refreshingly slender document accompanied by several short, supporting declarations. Jackson has, however, signaled a willingness to consider unsolicited opinions by accepting another brief filed by representatives of Harvard, Yale, Stanford and the Brookings Institution. That brief called for breaking Microsoft into four companies — three operating-systems company clones and one company for all of Microsoft’s other products. “So far, this case has been a battle between the titans,” ACT President Jonathan Zuck said in a statement. “It’s high time that all get a sense of the impact the government’s extreme proposal would have on those getting caught in the crossfire — the tech entrepreneurs.” According to the ACT brief, the government breakup proposal announced 18 days ago has already created a damaging sense of uncertainty in the software industry, even though it’s far from clear that Jackson will order a breakup. Jim Tyson, CEO of Active Designs, told Jackson that his customers already are fleeing from Microsoft’s products. “The Justice Department’s actions toward Microsoft have had a noticeable chilling effect on our customers — some of them are now anxious about, or even are opposed to, the use of Microsoft platforms and tools for their software applications,” Tyson said in a supporting declaration. On Wednesday, the government will respond to Microsoft’s counter-proposal, likely reiterating its call for a breakup and asking Jackson to allow Microsoft a limited amount of time and new legal tools to renew its defense. Jackson has scheduled a courtroom hearing on the trial’s remedy phase for May 24. Related Articles from the Industry Standard: Call It “Never Say Die” Microsoft Microsoft: Breaking Up Would Be a Radical Thing to Do Special Report: Microsoft Ruling Copyright � 2000 The Industry Standard

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.