Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
Because a doctor testified as a plaintiff's treating physician rather than as an expert and his opinions were not rendered solely for trial purposes, a common pleas court judge has ruled that the doctor's testimony was not governed by the discovery rule for expert witnesses, denying a motion to preclude Dr. Raymond Fritz's testimony in a medical malpractice action.
July 31, 2000 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS