A federal judge in New York dismissed a claim under the FMLA, holding that a state agency's finding of non-discrimination carries over into the federal case. The state Department of Human Rights' conclusion that termination was the result of cost-cutting precluded relitigation of the employers' motive in terminating the employee's job.
August 15, 2000 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A Southern District judge has dismissed a claim under the Family and Medical Leave Act, holding that a state agency’s finding of non-discrimination would carry over into the federal case.
The plaintiff’s claims under the FMLA were filed after she had previously sought relief under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the New York Human Rights Law.
Deal Watch: Skadden, Sidley, Slaughter and S&C Lead Big Paper Deal, While Private Funds Grow Massive
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
