The assumption of the risk defense does not apply as a complete bar to recovery in negligence cases arising out of the employment context, a unanimous en banc Pennsylvania Superior Court has held.

“We conclude that in the negligence context, where an employee is required to encounter a risk in order to perform his job, reasonable minds could differ as to whether a plaintiff/employee ‘deliberately and with awareness of specific risks inherent in the activity nonetheless engaged in the activity that produced his injury,’” Judge Kate Ford Elliott wrote for court. “Thus the employee’s conduct is better judged by reasonableness, that is, by negligence principles.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]